Skip to content
Tabled

C-290An Act to amend the Criminal Code (theft of property of cultural or religious significance)

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (theft of property of cultural or religious significance)

Private member's bill, introduced in the House of Commons on June 17, 2026

Status
At second reading in the House of Commons since June 17, 2026
Sponsor
Garnett GenuisConservative
Member of Parliament

What it does

Creates Criminal Code offences for stealing or possessing property of cultural or religious significance.

What it does

  • Creates a separate Criminal Code offence for theft of property that has cultural or religious significance.
  • Makes theft of such property punishable as an indictable offence with up to 10 years in prison, or as a summary conviction offence.
  • Creates a separate offence for possessing cultural or religious property when it was stolen in the theft offence.
  • Makes possession of such property punishable as an indictable offence with up to 5 years in prison, or as a summary conviction offence.
  • Adds the new theft offence to the Criminal Code definition of “offence” in section 183.

Who it affects

  • People who steal property
  • People who possess stolen property
  • Cultural communities
  • Religious communities
  • Police and courts

Background

The bill adds a new section 333.3 to the Criminal Code for theft and possession of property of cultural or religious significance.

Where it is

Last activity Jun 17

House of Commons

  1. First reading

    Completed.

  2. Second reading

    Current stage. Now here

  3. Committee

    Not reached.

  4. Report stage

    Not reached.

  5. Third reading

    Not reached.

Senate

  1. First reading

    Not reached.

  2. Second reading

    Not reached.

  3. Committee

    Not reached.

  4. Third reading

    Not reached.

Royal assent

  1. Royal assent

    Not reached.

Introduced by an MP who is not a minister. These bills compete in a lottery for debate time, and most do not become law. How a bill becomes law

How the House voted

No recorded votes yet

Many stages pass without a recorded vote (by unanimous consent or a voice vote). Senate votes are not included.

What MPs said

Each party’s first speech on this bill in the House, from Hansard. Excerpts are the speaker’s opening sentences, unedited.

  • ConservativeGarnett Genuis· June 17, 2026

    “Moved for leave to introduce Bill C‑290, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (theft of property of cultural or religious significance). Today I am tabling a new private member's bill, an act to amend the Criminal Code regarding theft of property of cultural or religious significance.”
    Read the full speech on openparliament.ca

Read the source

LEGISinfo status: Outside the Order of Precedence. Bill data from LEGISinfo, votes from openparliament.ca and the House of Commons. Last updated October 13, 2026.

Follow C-290 by RSS